Commons:Featured picture candidates
Other featured candidates
📽️ Media
|
Featured picture candidates Featured picture candidates are images that the community will vote on, to determine whether or not they will be highlighted as some of the finest on Commons. This page lists the candidates to become featured pictures. The picture of the day images are selected from featured pictures. Old candidates for featured pictures are listed in the log pages and in the candidate archives. There are also chronological lists of featured pictures: 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025, 2026 and current month. For another overview of our finest pictures, take a look at our annual picture of the year election. |
|||||||||||||||||||
Formal thingsNominatingGuidelines for nominatorsPlease read the complete guidelines before nominating. This is a summary of what to look for when submitting and reviewing FP candidates:
Artworks, illustrations, and historical documentsThere are many different types of non-photographic media, including engravings, watercolors, paintings, etchings, and various others. Hence, it is difficult to set hard-and-fast guidelines. However, generally speaking, works can be divided into three types: Those that can be scanned, those that must be photographed, and those specifically created to illustrate a subject. Works that must be photographed include most paintings, sculptures, works too delicate or too unique to allow them to be put on a scanner, and so on. For these, the requirements for photography, below, may be mostly followed; however, it should be noted that photographs which cut off part of the original painting are generally not considered featurable. Works that may be scanned include most works created by processes that allow for mass distribution − for instance, illustrations published with novels. For these, it is generally accepted that a certain amount of extra manipulation is permissible to remove flaws inherent to one copy of the work, since the particular copy – of which hundreds, or even thousands of copies also exist – is not so important as the work itself. Works created to serve a purpose include diagrams, scientific illustrations, and demonstrations of contemporary artistic styles. For these, the main requirement is that they serve their purpose well. Provided the reproduction is of high quality, an artwork generally only needs one of the following four things to be featurable:
Digital restorations must also be well documented. An unedited version of the image should be uploaded locally, when possible, and cross-linked from the file description page. Edit notes should be specified in detail, such as "Rotated and cropped. Dirt, scratches, and stains removed. Histogram adjusted and colors balanced." PhotographsOn the technical side, we have focus, exposure, composition, movement control and depth of field.
On the graphic elements we have shape, volume, color, texture, perspective, balance, proportion, noise, etc.
You will maximise the chances of your nominations succeeding if you read the complete guidelines before nominating. Video and audioPlease nominate videos, sounds, music, PDFs, etc. at Commons:Featured media candidates. Set nominationsIf a group of images are thematically connected in a direct and obvious way, they can be nominated together as a set. A set should fall under one of the following types:
Adding a new nominationIf you believe that you have found or created an image that could be considered valuable, with appropriate name, quality, image description, categories and licensing, then do the following. Step 1: copy the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Your image filename.jpg. Then click on the "create new nomination" button. All single files: For renominations, simply add /2 after the filename. For example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Foo.jpg/2
All set nomination pages should begin "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/", e.g. "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/My Nomination".
Step 3: manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list: Click here, and add the following line to the TOP of the nominations list:
Nominations are time-sensitive and for one-time use only. An automatic clock starts as soon as they are created. Do not create them in advance, save them for later or re-activate them. Galleries and FP categories: Please add a gallery page and section heading from the list at Commons FP galleries. Write the code as Page name#Section heading. For example: Optional: if you are not the creator of the image, please notify them using
An 'Alternative' is created by adding a sub-section to the nomination page: ====Alternative==== VotingEditors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 100 constructive, stable edits on Commons (excluding user and talk pages) can vote. Everybody can vote for their own nominations. Anonymous (IP) votes are not allowed. You may use the following templates:
You may indicate that the image has no chance of success with the template {{FPX|reason - ~~~~}}, where reason explains why the image is clearly unacceptable as a FP. The template can only be used when there are no support votes other than the one from the nominator. A well-written review helps participants (photographers, nominators and reviewers) improve their skills by providing insight into the strengths and weaknesses of a picture. Explain your reasoning, especially when opposing a candidate (which has been carefully selected by the author/nominator). English is the most widely understood language on Commons, but any language may be used in your review. A helpful review will often reference one or more of the criteria listed above. Unhelpful reasons for opposing include:
Remember also to put your signature (~~~~). Featured picture delisting candidatesOver time, featured picture standards change. It may be decided that for some pictures which were formerly "good enough", this is no longer the case. This is for listing an image which you believe no longer deserves to be a featured picture. For these, vote:
This can also be used for cases in which a previous version of an image was promoted to FP, but a newer version of the image has been made and is believed to be superior to the old version, e.g. a newly edited version of a photo or a new scan of a historical image. In particular, it is not intended for replacing older photos of a particular subject with newer photos of the same subject, or in any other case where the current FP and the proposed replacement are essentially different images. For these nominations, vote:
If you believe that some picture no longer meets the criteria for FP, you can nominate it for delisting, copying the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box: In the new delisting nomination page just created you should include:
After that, you have to manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list. As a courtesy, leave an informative note on the talk page(s) of the original creator, uploader(s), and nominator with a link to the delisting candidate. {{subst:FPC-notice-removal}} can be used for this purpose. Featured picture candidate policyGeneral rules
Featuring and delisting rulesA candidate will become a featured picture in compliance with following conditions:
The delisting rules are the same as those for FPs, with voting taking place over the same time period. The rule of the 5th day is applied to delisting candidates that have received no votes to delist, other than that of the proposer, by day 5. The FPCBot handles the vote counting and closing in most cases, current exceptions are candidates containing multiple versions (“alternatives”) of the image as well as delist-and-replace nominations. Any experienced user may close the requests not handled by the bot. For instructions on how to close nominations, see Commons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finished. Also note that there is a manual review stage between when the bot has counted the votes and before the nomination is finally closed by the bot; this manual review can be done by any user familiar with the voting rules. Hint: Until summer 2025, the bot was also not able to process FPXed, FPDed and withdrawn nominations as well as delist nominations; this has been fixed, users do not need to close such nominations anymore. Above all, be politePlease don't forget that the image you are judging is somebody's work. Avoid using phrases like "it looks terrible" and "I hate it". If you must oppose, please do so with consideration. Also remember that your command of English might not be the same as someone else's. Choose your words with care. Happy judging… and remember… all rules can be broken. See also
| |||||||||||||||||||
Table of contents
Featured picture candidates
Voting period ends on 12 Aug 2026 at 10:27:30 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/France#Hautes-Pyrénées
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 10:27, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 10:27, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Aug 2026 at 10:24:14 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications/Germany#Baden-Württemberg
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 10:24, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 10:24, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Aug 2026 at 10:10:46 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Species : Vulpes vulpes (Red Foxes)
Info Wild red fox in Island Beach State Park, US. Created by Flickr user Anthony Quintano – uploaded by Tm – nominated by LetmeEditit -- LetmeEditit (talk) 10:10, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- LetmeEditit (talk) 10:10, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Aug 2026 at 06:41:27 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Dicruridae_(Drongos)
Info All by -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:41, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:41, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support What a sharpness! -- Shagil Muzhappilangad (talk) 09:51, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Nice composition LetmeEditit (talk) 10:13, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:33, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Renfe AVE Class 102 Talgo 350 line scan Madrid 2018
Voting period ends on 12 Aug 2026 at 04:51:24 (UTC)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page
-
power car
-
B cars
-
T cars
-
Cafe and T car
-
T cars
-
T cars
-
power car
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Rail vehicles#Spain
Info created by dllu – uploaded by dllu – nominated by Dllu -- dllu (talk) 04:51, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Info Going through my backlog of photos. Much better quality than existing line scan FP such as File:Line scan photo of Shinkansen N700A Series Set G13 in 2017, car 01.png. However, the purple line and text are a bit washed out despite my best efforts, because I didn't have the IR-block filter at the time. dllu (talk) 04:51, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support These images still look like taken at light speed (or when the motif travels as fast as that) :D --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 12:26, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- dllu (talk) 04:51, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Aug 2026 at 04:41:38 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/People#Portraits, paintings of males
Info created by unknown Ming artist – uploaded by Kcx36 – nominated by Min968 -- Min968 (talk) 04:41, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Min968 (talk) 04:41, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Aug 2026 at 04:39:55 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/People#Portraits, paintings of males
Info created by unknown Ming artist – uploaded by Kcx36 – nominated by Min968 -- Min968 (talk) 04:39, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Min968 (talk) 04:39, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Aug 2026 at 01:54:57 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Clothing and Textiles
Info created and uploaded by J.Abisolon – nominated by ★ -- ★ 01:54, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- ★ 01:54, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Aug 2026 at 19:35:50 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Hymenoptera#Family : Vespidae (Hornets, Paper Wasps, Potter Wasps, and Yellowjackets)
Info A female paper wasp (Polistes dominula) on a rose bush. The absence of black marks in the yellow face (clypeus) indicates a lower social status. On the contrary, the presence of black patterns, as in here is a sign of strength. All by Alvesgaspar (talk) 19:35, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 19:35, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Neutral A nice story regarding the pecking order, but to me, the wasp is too small in proportion to the plant.--Famberhorst (talk) 04:48, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Aug 2026 at 14:47:38 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Belgium
Info The Atomium, Brussels at sunset. Taken by Pierre Blaché – uploaded/nominated by me --Юрий Д.К. 14:47, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Юрий Д.К. 14:47, 2 August 2026 (UTC)Beautiful as a thumbnail, but CAs and too much noise in my opinion --Benji 16:47, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Weak oppose - @Benjism89:
Done Юрий Д.К. 18:02, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Thanks, FP to me now --Benji 18:46, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
- @Benjism89:
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:52, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 21:22, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 21:46, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Steven Sun (talk) 01:18, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- IamMM (talk) 07:36, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:11, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Good representation of the subject LetmeEditit (talk) 10:16, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:33, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Aug 2026 at 14:47:46 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Norway
Info Oslo Opera House at blue hour. Taken by Pierre Blaché – uploaded/nominated by me --Юрий Д.К. 14:47, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Юрий Д.К. 14:47, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Nice colours LetmeEditit (talk) 10:17, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:33, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Aug 2026 at 14:10:10 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Leiothrichidae (Laughingthrushes)
Info created and uploaded by Mildeep – nominated by Nirmal Dulal -- Nirmal Dulal (talk) 14:10, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Nirmal Dulal (talk) 14:10, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:14, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 15:29, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 17:03, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:53, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 00:11, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:37, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 07:24, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:27, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- IamMM (talk) 07:36, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Amazing level of detail... you can see every individual ridge on the feathers. LetmeEditit (talk) 10:20, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:33, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Maryliflower (talk) 10:43, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Aug 2026 at 13:13:06 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family_:_Giraffidae_(Giraffes)
Info Angolan giraffe licking its nose in Etosha National Park, Namibia. Giraffes commonly perform this behaviour to clean and moisten the nostrils, helping remove dust, pollen, parasites, and other debris from the nasal surface. This grooming behaviour is facilitated by the tongue's remarkable length (up to about 45 cm) and muscular flexibility, adaptations that also enable efficient browsing on thorny vegetation.
Info created by Giles Laurent – uploaded by Giles Laurent – nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:13, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:13, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:13, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 17:02, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:54, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 00:11, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:36, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 07:24, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:25, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- IamMM (talk) 07:36, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:33, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Aug 2026 at 13:12:00 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Psittacidae_(True_(African_and_New_World)_Parrots)
Info created by Giles Laurent – uploaded by Giles Laurent – nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:12, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:12, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:13, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:55, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 00:11, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:51, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:37, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:24, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Weak oppose – Nice behavioral capture and composition, but the motion blur on the raised wing and the slightly overprocessed appearance keep it just below my FP threshold,sorry --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 07:31, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
- The picture was taken at 1/2000s and I see no motion blur as each feather is clearly visible. I don't see any overprocessing neither. The image is simply smaller than the girafe one as these small birds were far away and that even a 800mm zoom required some cropping -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:24, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Amazing vibrancy, the sunlight and shadows are so clear. It's lovely ;) LetmeEditit (talk) 10:31, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Aug 2026 at 06:41:31 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Reliefs
Info All by Shagil Muzhappilangad -- Shagil Muzhappilangad (talk) 06:41, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Shagil Muzhappilangad (talk) 06:41, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Comment a slight crop on the left to center the sculpture would be better. UnpetitproleX (Talk) 07:53, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Not the best lighting. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 11:24, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Aug 2026 at 06:02:55 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Nepal
Info created by Saddam19 – uploaded by Saddam19 – nominated by Saddam19 -- Saddam19 (talk) 06:02, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Saddam19 (talk) 06:02, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Oppose The clouds show plenty of artifacts and the sharpness just isn't there. It's a good addition to Commons, but I don't think it's FP material. —brainandforce [yap] 04:03, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Aug 2026 at 02:04:58 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports#Association football (soccer)
Info created and uploaded by Berlination – nominated by ★ -- ★ 02:04, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- ★ 02:04, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 06:46, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Comment I think this photo is superior without any doubt, but I also think that images like File:Spain team celebrating Argentina v Spain 19 July 2026-337.jpg, File:Dani Olmo Argentina v Spain 19 July 2026-346.jpg, File:Alex Grimaldo Spain team Argentina v Spain 19 July 2026-351.jpg show more emotion (maybe more "wow"), while your nomination is more documenting the celebration as whole. Any way, I think one of these images will be promoted :) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 12:49, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
- Btw, I was about to nominate of these images either :D --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 12:51, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Comment Very good, but I believe the arm on the left should be cropped out --Benji 16:53, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Comment A pity that the president is not shown on this photo. Was he cloned off?... :)) -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 17:00, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Visibly tilted and has half a guy's arm on the left hand side (with clear red colour fringing too). Cmao20 (talk) 18:59, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Alternative
Info Alternative added as suggested by PantheraLeo1359531. ★ 20:49, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Weak oppose The composition is too tight; besides, Trump is missing. --Wilfredor (talk) 00:12, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Aug 2026 at 19:19:47 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Mammals#Genus_:_Urocitellus_(Ground_squirrels)
Info Uinta ground squirrel in Yellowstone National Park. all by — Rhododendrites talk | 19:19, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Support — Rhododendrites talk | 19:19, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Support ---- Jakubhal 20:42, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 05:29, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- IamMM (talk) 08:13, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 08:18, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:14, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:52, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:14, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 18:58, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:57, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:52, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:23, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- IamMM (talk) 07:37, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:34, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --JackyM59 (talk) 12:04, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on Mon, 10 Aug 2026 19:19:08 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Black and White#Places
Info My own work. --Wilfredor (talk) 19:19, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 19:19, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:13, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support B&W fitted very well. ★ 10:18, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:53, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:15, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 18:57, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:22, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:34, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Dull lighting. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 11:25, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Aug 2026 at 19:15:37 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural/United_States#Wyoming
Info Panorama of the Mammoth Hot Springs in Yellowstone National Park. Haven't been taking as many pictures lately, but went a little crazy on a recent trip to Yellowstone (my first time). Definitely one of the best places I've been. We got in late, with two full days and one late afternoon/evening on arrival that we spent here, at Mammoth. Just uploaded lots of photos, and it's hard to choose one to nominate, but I think this might be my favorite. I really loved the simultaneous beauty and death of this place, with the wonderful color gradients mixed with inhospitable ecology, steam, and preserved dead trees. all by — Rhododendrites talk | 19:15, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Support — Rhododendrites talk | 19:15, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Support ---- Jakubhal 20:43, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- IamMM (talk) 08:08, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 08:13, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:12, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:52, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:15, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Always good to see your photos here Cmao20 (talk) 18:55, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support It’s like seeing a scene from another planet or another geological era. --Wilfredor (talk) 00:13, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:21, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:34, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Maryliflower (talk) 10:43, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Aug 2026 at 19:06:21 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Family : Acrididae (Short-horned grasshoppers and locusts)
Info The southern wartbiter (Decticus albifrons) is a species of large bush-cricket recognized by its white face, very long antennae and large size, common in southern Europe and Mediterranean regions. This specimen was photographed in Porto Covo, Portugal. All by Alvesgaspar (talk) 19:06, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 19:06, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 08:14, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:11, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Comment: there is peculiar noise visible as black speckles all over the image, especially noticeable in the background. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:12, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
- I believe those were sharpening artefacts. A new unsharpened version was uploaded. Alvesgaspar (talk) 15:54, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support: better --The Cosmonaut (talk) 21:21, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 18:55, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 00:13, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- IamMM (talk) 07:37, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Very useful for identification, with neutral, soft lighting. Same quality as a studio photo, but in the wild. LetmeEditit (talk) 10:38, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Aug 2026 at 13:09:31 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Malta
Info: Ix-Xaqqa cliffs; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 13:09, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 13:09, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 14:04, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --JackyM59 (talk) 14:57, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 19:19, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:11, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:51, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 15:37, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 18:54, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:18, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- IamMM (talk) 07:37, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Aug 2026 at 12:43:38 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports#Association football (soccer)
Info Football, women, UEFA Women's Champions League, Olympique Lyonnais vs. FC Barcelona; Olympique Lyonnais celebrating the 0–4 goal scored by Ada Hegerberg (Olympique Lyon, 14); from left: Lucy Bronze (Olympique Lyon, 2), Shanice van de Sanden (Olympique Lyon, 11). Created by Stepro – uploaded by Stepro – nominated by Zquid -- Zquid (talk) 12:43, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Zquid (talk) 12:43, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 13:58, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- E bailey (talk) 16:49, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Support ---- Jakubhal 20:44, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- IamMM (talk) 08:14, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 08:14, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:50, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Well composed and really evokes the emotions of victory! Cmao20 (talk) 18:53, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:17, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:34, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Aug 2026 at 09:20:48 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Support -- Aokoroko (talk) 09:20, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 13:42, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 13:48, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Zquid (talk) 18:30, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- IamMM (talk) 08:15, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Question I don't understand. Theoretically, all points of your figure are located in the hyperbolic component of period 2, that is, they belong to the M-set. Thus, what do the different colors represent? -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 11:32, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
- That is factually incorrect. The coordinates of this frame Re ≈ -1.02845, Im ≈ 0.36146 do not belong to the interior period-2 hyperbolic component (which is a perfect disk centered at c = -1 with a radius of 0.25). Instead, this location is deep within the exterior filament network of the Mandelbrot set. Therefore, all pixels in this image represent escaping orbits. Rather complex exterior fractal hubs that naturally mirror the self-similar geometry. Aokoroko (talk) 12:34, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
- You are quite right, sorry. Alvesgaspar (talk) 13:22, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Mesmerizing, makes me want to zoom into these different places :3 --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 12:56, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 13:45, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 15:38, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Comment I made an edit to the source code because it was taking too long to generate the fractal. --Wilfredor (talk) 00:14, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
- Explain that it doesn't work that way. Wilfredor took my Source code and edited it. It doesn't work on the Source code.
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Mandelbrot_Set_Image_113.png
- This is NOT an optimized version, it's vandalism. Please undo this. And don't do it again. Aokoroko (talk) 08:09, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
- It was just a typo. I’ve added the correction. Majow (talk) 08:14, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
- "It was taking too long to generate the fractal"???????????????????????????? This is terrible! Aokoroko (talk) 08:18, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
- The calculation can be performed significantly faster by using bilinear approximation. You can view an example of this here: https://colab.research.google.com/drive/1brTL6clAbE32JKunBfSAq4gjZyPTxdb6?usp=sharing Majow (talk) 08:19, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
- But I'm not 10,000 x 10,000 pixels, I'm 80,000 x 80,000! Every 1 equals 64 SSAA. Aokoroko (talk) 08:35, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
- That has nothing to do with it: only about 20% of the iterations actually need to be calculated, while around 80% can be skipped. Majow (talk) 08:43, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
- However, to meet the highest quality standards, one should naturally avoid skipping. That said, even a trained eye would not be able to detect a difference... Majow (talk) 08:47, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
- The appearance of noise ("needles" or "grains") in deep areas The skip method uses a linear approximation. If the precision factor (in the code, this is line 1e-10) is chosen too aggressively, then in the deepest areas, where the distortions of the fractal space become extreme, the mathematical model may slightly "overshoot." What it looks like: Microscopic dots, stripes, or "noisy" pixels may appear on smooth color gradients. How to fix it if you notice defects: Change 1e-10 to a more stringent value, such as 1e-12 or 1e-14. The jumps will become slightly less frequent, but the artifacts will disappear completely. Aokoroko (talk) 09:08, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
- Aokoroko, you're right to ask for the code to be restored. As I mentioned in your comment on my talk page, this wasn't vandalism (Commons defines vandalism as an action intended to cause harm and notes that a misguided or poorly thought-out edit, even if made in good faith, shouldn't be considered vandalism). Vandalism involves a premeditated action to cause harm. I generated your fractal in a fraction of the time it used to take, but any faster implementation or bilinear approximation should be presented separately as an alternative. I wanted to thank Majow for correcting the compilation error in the directive. I apologize for replacing the original code without discussing it first. Wilfredor (talk) 12:58, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
- The appearance of noise ("needles" or "grains") in deep areas The skip method uses a linear approximation. If the precision factor (in the code, this is line 1e-10) is chosen too aggressively, then in the deepest areas, where the distortions of the fractal space become extreme, the mathematical model may slightly "overshoot." What it looks like: Microscopic dots, stripes, or "noisy" pixels may appear on smooth color gradients. How to fix it if you notice defects: Change 1e-10 to a more stringent value, such as 1e-12 or 1e-14. The jumps will become slightly less frequent, but the artifacts will disappear completely. Aokoroko (talk) 09:08, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
- But I'm not 10,000 x 10,000 pixels, I'm 80,000 x 80,000! Every 1 equals 64 SSAA. Aokoroko (talk) 08:35, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:15, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 9 Aug 2026 at 18:43:52 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family_:_Gobiidae_(Gobies)
Info Blackfin dartfish (Ptereleotris evides), Nosy Kalakajoro, Madagascar. This species of dartfish is native to the Indian Ocean and the western Pacific Ocean. It is a reef inhabitant and can be found at depths of 2–15 metres (6.6–49.2 ft). This species can reach 14 centimetres (5.5 in) of total length and may be found in the aquarium trade. Note: there are not FPs of the whole genus Ptereleotris (that comprises 20 species) on Commons. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 18:43, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 18:43, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:53, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Weak support This image uses 6% of sensor pixels, But given the difficulty of using a telephoto lens at sea, I think I can make an exception. --Wilfredor (talk) 21:37, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
- I understand and agree. I can add to that that this species is rare, small and hard to photograph. Focusing on a small creature under water that moves shakely is a real challenge. Poco a poco (talk) 10:47, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
- Thank for your explain, yes, I considered those situational aspects; I think underwater photography should be governed by different parameters than taking a photo inside a church. Wilfredor (talk) 23:20, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
- I understand and agree. I can add to that that this species is rare, small and hard to photograph. Focusing on a small creature under water that moves shakely is a real challenge. Poco a poco (talk) 10:47, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 09:28, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- IamMM (talk) 10:45, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Support per nomination and Wilfredor - I definitely think this nomination was worthwhile given the species' rarity and small size. Cmao20 (talk) 11:21, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 13:50, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Zquid (talk) 18:28, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:10, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:50, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 15:40, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Excellent effort! —brainandforce [yap] 03:55, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:14, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 9 Aug 2026 at 14:29:08 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Motacillidae_(Wagtails,_Longclaws_and_Pipits)
Info White Wagtail (Motacilla alba alba) with nesting material in its beak in early April, in the Mönchbruch nature reserve, Germany.
Created, uploaded and nominated by NorbertNagel -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 14:29, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 14:29, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:52, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 12:10, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --JackyM59 (talk) 13:21, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 13:46, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 13:50, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:29, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 18:50, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:15, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 08:15, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:09, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:49, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- IamMM (talk) 07:37, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 10:18, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:34, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on Sun, 09 Aug 2026 13:31:52 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#Canada
Info My own work. --Wilfredor (talk) 13:31, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 13:31, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:55, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support Good shot, cant find any mistake, unless "its too big" some can have problem to open. ZoomViewer is "updating". Good option is Panorama, since too wide to be so sharp in borders. Otherwise i would use smaller Aperture. --Mile (talk) 09:53, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
- You are right, the size can be annoying, that's why I decided to save this image in jpg with reduced size, the tiff version is also available but it would greatly limit the process of evaluating it Wilfredor (talk) 22:44, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Striking building, satisfyingly presented under gentle golden light. Cmao20 (talk) 11:25, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 13:47, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 13:50, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:27, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- IamMM (talk) 15:33, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --JackyM59 (talk) 17:10, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Zquid (talk) 18:26, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:08, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:48, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 15:41, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 09:40, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 9 Aug 2026 at 09:25:39 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Shells#Family : Nassariidae
Info created by Llez – uploaded by Llez – nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 09:25, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Llez (talk) 09:25, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --Milseburg (talk) 09:36, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --JackyM59 (talk) 11:41, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support ---- Jakubhal 12:21, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 12:52, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support -- IamMM (talk) 13:18, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:13, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support We should create a new rule to automatically approve all photos of Llez snails, in so many years I have never seen a nomination that has not passed --Wilfredor (talk) 17:40, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:32, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:51, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 09:22, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 11:23, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:20, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:47, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 10:16, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Aug 2026 at 21:00:05 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Fungi#Family : Mycenaceae
Info Pink-capped Mycena (Mycena rosella) in the Bruderwald. All by me -- Ermell (talk) 21:00, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Ermell (talk) 21:00, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Support -- IamMM (talk) 06:45, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 08:59, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:19, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --JackyM59 (talk) 11:42, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support ---- Jakubhal 12:21, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 12:51, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support Great & interesting details! -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 14:53, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 18:42, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Weak support Nice detail but the blurry areas in the foreground are a minus Poco a poco (talk) 19:33, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 01:46, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 09:04, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 11:23, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 13:57, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:19, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 18:50, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:47, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 15:42, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:34, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Aug 2026 at 17:07:38 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy#Galaxies
Info A close-up of the central bar of the Large Magnellanic Cloud, highlighting the Tarantula Nebula. Created by the European Southern Observatory (ESO)'s 1 meter Schmidt telescope in 1986 (on photographic plates!) – uploaded by Szczureq – nominated by brainandforce —brainandforce [yap] 17:07, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Support we have only one featured image of the LMC, which is not a visible light image. This does not cover the whole LMC, but it has extraordinary depth and is a wonderful example of pre-digital astrophotography. —brainandforce [yap] 17:07, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 17:24, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --Thi (talk) 09:46, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 12:51, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support Cool Cmao20 (talk) 11:23, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:47, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 15:45, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- IamMM (talk) 07:40, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 10:16, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Aug 2026 at 07:56:00 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/France#Pas-de-Calais
Info created by JackyM59 – uploaded by JackyM59 – nominated by JackyM59 -- JackyM59 (talk) 07:56, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:23, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Support SAIDI Ismail (talk) 19:34, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:02, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 08:58, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:20, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Comment I don't think Category "Views from Cap Blanc-Nez" is correct. It's a view of the cap. --Milseburg (talk) 09:40, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Comment Thank you. It's corrected. -- JackyM59 (talk) 11:22, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 12:50, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Weak oppose I like the compo of the background but I find the foreground, which is 60% of the image unappealing, sorry. Poco a poco (talk) 19:36, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Comment I understand the remark. It was not obvious to have a foreground without tourists. I took a step back. I hesitated to present this photo with goelands in the foreground:this one -- JackyM59 (talk) 06:50, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
- Yes, this one is better. I would crop a bit at the bottom, then it would be great. Yann (talk) 09:30, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:58, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Alternative
InfoCap Blanc-Nez (Escalles) seen from the beach at low tide.
Comment: To take the comments into account, I am proposing another version with a different foreground. -- JackyM59 (talk) 15:07, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Better than above. Yann (talk) 16:54, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Support This one too.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:35, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Support This version is FP to me. Cmao20 (talk) 12:52, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:03, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- IamMM (talk) 07:40, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support for the alternative. – Aristeas (talk) 10:15, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:34, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Aug 2026 at 06:34:17 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Others
Info created by Cvmontuy – uploaded by Cvmontuy – nominated by Cvmontuy -- Cvmontuy (talk) 06:34, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Cvmontuy (talk) 06:34, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Support While there may be some minor technical imperfections on close inspection, they hardly detract from the overall impact. The deceptively simple composition, with the solitary weathered post silhouetted against the glowing sky, creates a strikingly atmospheric and memorable image. I found myself returning to it repeatedly, which is perhaps the strongest compliment I can give. -- Radomianin (talk) 22:38, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support I agree with Radomianin. The whole scene feels deeply unsettling and ominous. --Maryliflower (talk) 05:59, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Support At first, I was struck by a jarring composition, a log lying across the middle that I didn't quite understand, but then I saw a solitary, almost human figure, a wounded, incomplete, and weathered log that nonetheless stands tall facing the sea, watching the sunset, a sea that will, sooner or later, swallow it whole. Taking the thought a bit further, it could represent someone who keeps waiting even after a loss. The sea represents distance and the passage of time, while the wood, now black and bare, still holds the memory of something that was once alive. The amber light of the sunset also lends an air of melancholy; the log seems to be searching for the sun or gazing directly at it. --Wilfredor (talk) 03:21, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support: for the brooding atmosphere. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:13, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 15:46, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Strong support Aside from the excellent composition, it's evoking lots of interesting and varied emotions from the viewers. Perhaps I shouldn't base my vote too strongly on the opinions of others, but the fact that it's evoking such a response only strengthens its case as FP. —brainandforce [yap] 04:08, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:04, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support And a clever idea: the obvious thing to do was to take the usual beautiful, but inevitably unoriginal photo of the sunset on the sea; by instead focusing on the weathered post you have found an inspired and much more interesting solution. – Aristeas (talk) 09:38, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Aug 2026 at 00:41:41 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#Germany
Info High quality interior, comparable in resolution and detail to others in the gallery; no FPs from the inside of this palace so far. created by AuHaidhausen – uploaded by AuHaidhausen – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 00:41, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 00:41, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --Cvmontuy (talk) 06:37, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --JackyM59 (talk) 07:36, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:20, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Comment The photo relies on symmetry. And that symmetry is disrupted when you look at the left and right edges, as well as the floor tiles. Could you perhaps fix that? -- XRay 💬 18:12, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
- Unfortunately the hall itself is not symmetrical, so I’m not sure if anything could be done. Cmao20 (talk) 21:58, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Support -- IamMM (talk) 07:26, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:02, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:21, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 09:39, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 12:50, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 18:10, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:38, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:17, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 09:10, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Support as per nomination. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:12, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:46, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 15:46, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:34, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Aug 2026 at 00:41:52 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Lybiidae (African Barbets)
Info This would be the second FP of this species, but it's a very different angle to the other one. created by Giles Laurent – uploaded by Giles Laurent – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 00:41, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 00:41, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 01:53, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:21, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 03:44, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --Maryliflower (talk) 03:58, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --Cvmontuy (talk) 06:38, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --JackyM59 (talk) 07:36, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 08:58, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Support Thank you very much for the nomination! :) -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:15, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
- You're very welcome. Cmao20 (talk) 11:08, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 11:23, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:19, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Support —brainandforce [yap] 17:09, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:25, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Support SAIDI Ismail (talk) 21:36, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Support -- IamMM (talk) 07:27, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 08:55, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:23, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support Interesting bird, excellent photo. – Aristeas (talk) 09:40, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 12:50, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 14:55, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:39, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 09:10, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 05:30, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 15:47, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:34, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Aug 2026 at 21:28:31 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Austria
Info The northern facade of the Leoben Judiciary Center at night. The complex houses the district and regional court, local prison, and public prosecutor's offices. All by me. --Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 21:28, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 21:28, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 22:16, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:22, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Support A beautiful photo. May I ask if the building is actually sagging in the middle? -- XRay 💬 18:19, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
- @XRay: Thank you. This is also what I was asking myself while editing! The most logical explanation to me is some misalignment while shooting (I used a very cheap tripod without any specialized gear for taking panoramas) or some faulty settings while editing (I am slowly getting a hang of PTgui, but still don't understand how to compensate for certain perspective effects like in this case). Anyway, I have more confidence in Austrian civil engineers to correctly level their buildings than I do in myself to take a correct panorama, but you gotta start somewhere, I guess! :) If anyone has an idea how to fix this in PTgui, any advice is welcome! --Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 01:07, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support The contrast between the lighted and unlighted portions of the building, and the sky, are well-handled. Acroterion (talk) 22:03, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:02, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 08:54, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:25, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Weak support Nice motif, the quality at the borders drops significantly Poco a poco (talk) 19:41, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
- I assume this is due to the wide aperture, I will consider this in the future! Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 22:08, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 09:01, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:08, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 15:48, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support per Acroterion. – Aristeas (talk) 10:12, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:34, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Aug 2026 at 21:06:03 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Belgium
Info All by iMahesh (talk) 21:06, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
Comment Good, but
Needs more categories. --Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 21:30, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
- Hello @Aciarium: I've added a few categories. iMahesh (talk) 03:24, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
- @I.Mahesh: Thank you, looks good now.
Support. --Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 07:03, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
- @I.Mahesh: Thank you, looks good now.
- Hello @Aciarium: I've added a few categories. iMahesh (talk) 03:24, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Support Well framed and high quality capture of eclectic and interesting architecture Cmao20 (talk) 12:46, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Support Very detailed, this is really rewarding for this fascinating building with its many interesting details. The light from the side nicely emphasizes the sculptures, ornaments etc. – Aristeas (talk) 18:59, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:06, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
File:Pez unicornio de nariz corta (Naso brevirostris), Ambalihabe, Madagascar, 2025-09-16, DD 64.jpg
Voting period ends on 7 Aug 2026 at 20:35:58 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family_:_Acanthuridae_(Surgeonfish)
Info Short-nosed unicornfish (Naso brevirostris), Ambalihabe, Madagascar. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:35, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:35, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 08:58, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Support Another outstanding one Cmao20 (talk) 12:45, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:23, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:28, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Support SAIDI Ismail (talk) 21:36, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Support I can't imagine what a long-nosed unicornfish looks like. Acroterion (talk) 22:05, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Support -- IamMM (talk) 07:27, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:02, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 08:52, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:26, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 13:40, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 14:59, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 09:02, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:42, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 10:11, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:34, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Aug 2026 at 18:58:15 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Italy#Sicily
Info: Tonnarella dell'Uzzo Cove, Zingaro Nature Reserve; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 18:58, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 18:58, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 21:33, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --JackyM59 (talk) 07:37, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 12:44, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:19, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Support The blurry swimmer is a bit disturbing but good enough for FP.--Ermell (talk) 20:30, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Support -- IamMM (talk) 07:27, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:02, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 08:51, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:27, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:42, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:41, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 14:58, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Beautiful. Although IMHO you could do with less/finer sharpening; here e.g. the beach looks a little bit unnatural (like a coarse gravel beach). On APS-C, ƒ/10 or ƒ/11 already introduces much diffraction, so you lose fine details, and sharpening cannot restore them. At 18mm on APS-C, ƒ/8 or even ƒ/6.3 should already give enough depth of field and would save more fine details, so that you could do with less sharpening in post and could get a crisper result. No offence, just a little suggestion. – Aristeas (talk) 10:10, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Aug 2026 at 17:54:05 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Palaces#Germany
Info created by Llez – uploaded by Llez – nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 17:54, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Llez (talk) 17:54, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 19:01, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:22, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --JackyM59 (talk) 07:37, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 12:44, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:18, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Support Great architectural photo. If there’s anything that could be improved, it’s at most the small tree on the right edge, which is slightly cropped out. -- XRay 💬 18:21, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:31, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Support -- IamMM (talk) 07:27, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:02, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:28, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:43, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 09:11, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Oppose I would low Luminance of Orange/yellow and solve CA around antennas/borders, right side. --Mile (talk) 08:36, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:41, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support The obvious thing would have been to take a centered shot, but the result would have been rather boring with that light; therefore the asymmetric framing was an excellent idea – it makes most of the light and gives a good impression of the court. – Aristeas (talk) 10:09, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:35, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Aug 2026 at 09:44:16 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Tunisia
Info created by Smailtn – uploaded by Smailtn – nominated by Smailtn -- SAIDI Ismail (talk) 09:44, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
Support -- SAIDI Ismail (talk) 09:44, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 15:43, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 19:02, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --JackyM59 (talk) 07:38, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Support Majestic view Cmao20 (talk) 12:44, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:18, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Comment The buildings in the back are leaning.--Ermell (talk) 20:33, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
- Hi Ermell, thank you, problem solved SAIDI Ismail (talk) 21:47, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Support -- IamMM (talk) 07:27, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:02, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 08:50, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:30, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Not sharp enough and too noisy for FR-level. --Milseburg (talk) 09:43, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
- Hi Milseburg, I increased the clarity and reduced the noise SAIDI Ismail (talk) 10:42, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Neutral Nice view but low detail Poco a poco (talk) 19:45, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Comment @SAIDI Ismail you lose small sharpness with f/13, some f/9 good. If so wide make Panorama, 2-3 shots same setting. --Mile (talk) 09:57, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
- thank you for your precious help SAIDI Ismail (talk) 11:18, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:35, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Aug 2026 at 06:02:53 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Cisticolidae_(Cisticolas)
Info All by -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:02, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:02, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 15:40, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 16:20, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 17:50, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 19:02, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --JackyM59 (talk) 07:38, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 12:43, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Support -- IamMM (talk) 07:27, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:02, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 09:31, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support ---- Jakubhal 12:23, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Weak support Quality is fine and the compo good but the motif not so extraordinary (from the aesthetic point of view) Poco a poco (talk) 19:47, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 09:12, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:40, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Aug 2026 at 04:00:34 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asparagales#Family_:_Amaryllidaceae
Info Germinating bulbil of Natal lily (Crinum moorei). Bulbil 4 cm (1.6 in) diameter, 3 cm (1.2 in) high, root (radicle) 4 cm (1.6 in) long. Focus stack of 36 images. No FPs of bulbils. Created by Tagooty – uploaded by Tagooty – nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 04:00, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Tagooty (talk) 04:00, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 05:43, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:04, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
Support -- IamMM (talk) 07:45, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:16, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 11:51, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 15:23, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 15:40, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
Support--Ermell (talk) 16:19, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 17:49, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --Benji 17:55, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Technically well done. QI, VI - yes, and rather a unique subject, but just not enough wow for me. --GRDN711 (talk) 18:24, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
- @GRDN711: A search of FPs of bulbs shows that the only FPs of bulbs/bulbils are foods such as onion and garlic. All FPs of lilies depict only the flowers and buds. This image of a germinating bulbil will be a unique addition to the collection of FPs. Please consider this aspect, if you haven't already done so. Tagooty (talk) 04:03, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
- @Tagooty: My thoughts remain that the good technical quality and the uniqueness of this image would make it an excellent VI candidate; for FP, needs more wow. --GRDN711 (talk) 16:32, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support Excellent focus stack Cmao20 (talk) 12:43, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:17, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:02, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 09:31, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:48, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support Zquid (talk) 18:25, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 Aug 2026 at 18:19:07 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports#Cycling
Info Florian Lipowitz on track for Stage 5 win in Novo Mesto and overall Tour of Slovenia 2026 victory. My shot. Mile (talk) 07:12, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
Info II : Made in strong heat over asphalt, somewhere can be seen as blurry...and made it more epical
Support -- Mile (talk) 18:19, 28 July 2026 (UTC)
Support Wow! LetmeEditit (talk) 18:25, 28 July 2026 (UTC)
Comment Please add creator, uploader, nominator. --Tagooty (talk) 04:03, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
- Done. Mile (talk) 07:12, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
Comment A tighter crop would better emphasize the rider and make a more impactful image. Alternatively, waiting until the rider rode closer would even be better. --GRDN711 (talk) 18:20, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
- I have that too,but cant show emotions as here, while passing finish line, with all that yelling crowd beside. Will nominate after this. Obviously Sport is "not interesred" on FP. Mile (talk) 10:17, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 12:41, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Support —brainandforce [yap] 17:10, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:02, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support Well done, and I agree that cropping or waiting longer creates a completely different image (not better). Would be easier to the eye if contrast and saturation of the OOF background would be reduced, that would also nicely emphasize the cyclist. – Aristeas (talk) 09:25, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:13, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:35, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 Aug 2026 at 08:35:45 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Space exploration#Others
Info created by Smithsonian Institution / National Air and Space Museum – uploaded and nominated by IamMM -- IamMM (talk) 08:35, 28 July 2026 (UTC)
Support The crop is tight and the background—especially on the left—isn't great, but I still think this camera deserves a run on FPC. There's only one other image of it on Commons, and that one is low quality.-- IamMM (talk) 08:35, 28 July 2026 (UTC)
Support Interesting stuff, i thought would be Kodak or Hassel. --Mile (talk) 09:38, 28 July 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 15:38, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
Comment I'd crop the uppermost part --Llez (talk) 17:47, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
Support, but agree with the above --The Cosmonaut (talk) 19:02, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Agree with the suggested cropping and if done, would support this image as suitable for QI/VI but IMHO it does not have the wow for FP. --GRDN711 (talk) 22:15, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
Support ★ 02:55, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Support per nomination, for me there is wow in the object even if not the composition Cmao20 (talk) 12:40, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Support Is it weird to say I kinda like the tight crop here? —brainandforce [yap] 17:13, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:03, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support per Cmao20. The composition is not perfect, but IMHO a top-crop would not help, because it would remove almost all context and disorientate the viewer, so I agree with Brainandforce. – Aristeas (talk) 09:18, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Distracting background --Wilfredor (talk) 13:41, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Agree with GRD711, those cropped cameras at the top spoil the image Poco a poco (talk) 19:51, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Oppose per GRDN and Poco. Yann (talk) 20:56, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 Aug 2026 at 04:20:05 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Sculptures outdoors
Info Sea dike near Koehool. Artwork ‘Watdataaangaat’ on the sea dike with the rising tide of the Wadden Sea in the background. 'Watdataaangaat' is an artwork on the sea dike near Koehool, in memory of Joop Mulder (the founder of Oerol). The artwork was designed by Marc van Vliet.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:20, 28 July 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:20, 28 July 2026 (UTC)
Comment Very calm and nice photo, but noisy a bit and has dust spots (noted). Would support if it will be fixed. Юрий Д.К. 15:34, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
- @Юрий Д.К.:
Done. Noise Reduction + spot removed Thanks for your reviews.--Famberhorst (talk) 04:13, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
- @Юрий Д.К.:
Support Excellent minimalist composition that highlights the qualities of the artwork well. Cmao20 (talk) 12:39, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 14:36, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:48, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Support -- IamMM (talk) 07:27, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:03, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 09:14, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry to say but I see nothing really extraordinary here Poco a poco (talk) 19:52, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Oppose now a QI image, but doesn't reach compelling threshold and encyclopedic value to me. --E bailey (talk) 16:46, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Oppose I'm very sorry but per Poco a poco --Wilfredor (talk) 00:01, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Oppose The picture doesn't hit me like an extraordinary capture. Sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:25, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support MZaplotnik(talk) 08:22, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 Aug 2026 at 02:25:41 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
Info People in historical nun dresses take part in a historical reenactment at the nuns' choir in the Arouca Monastery in Arouca, Portugal. The reenactment portrays monastic daily life, the lives of Cistercian nuns, and the social context of the 18th and 19th centuries. Created by Afsalgado – uploaded by Afsalgado – nominated by GumballNine1Nine -- GumballNine1Nine (talk) 02:25, 28 July 2026 (UTC)
Support -- GumballNine1Nine (talk) 02:25, 28 July 2026 (UTC)
Support -- IamMM (talk) 08:12, 28 July 2026 (UTC)
Support I tried +++ Contrast, +Highlights, +Shadows and it more magical. But also this is good too. --Mile (talk) 09:57, 28 July 2026 (UTC)
Comment Once again no information is provided about the context and meaning of this picture. Why is one of the women dressed as a bride? Yes, it could be that she is about to be ordained as a nun. But is it really? There is much more than aesthetics in this image, and that should be explained before seriously considering a promotion to FP. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 19:59, 28 July 2026 (UTC)
- I hope the description is better now. GumballNine1Nine (talk) 01:13, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry but the information is too general and does not address the scene. Image quality is on the poor side. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 09:53, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 11:53, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 19:03, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
Support Featurable for artistic quality. I added a couple of categories. Cmao20 (talk) 12:38, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Support -- XRay 💬 18:23, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:01, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Weak support per Cmao20. Of course the description could be more detailed. IMHO the image quality is not poor: the photo was taken at 75mm ƒ/1.2 (corresponding to a fullframe equivalent of 113mm ƒ/1.8) in order to separate the persons from the background, that worked well, and the fine hairs/fibre at the edges show that the focus is actually correct. (But the CAs could and should be removed/reduced; there is noticeable purple fringing at the high-contrast edges – easy to mitigate in post-processing.) – Aristeas (talk) 09:06, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Neutral Interesting and original but also per Alvesgaspar Poco a poco (talk) 19:54, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:39, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Aug 2026 at 19:22:59 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Strigidae_(True_Owls)
Info created by Manojkiri photography – uploaded by Manojkiri photography – nominated by TOUMOU -- Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 19:22, 27 July 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 19:22, 27 July 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 15:31, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
Weak support Presumably downsampled and quite small, but great composition + expression Cmao20 (talk) 12:36, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Support —brainandforce [yap] 17:14, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:01, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Excesive denoise --Wilfredor (talk) 13:42, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Weak oppose I concur with Wilfredor + too small motif, sorry Poco a poco (talk) 19:56, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Only 2,696 × 1,796 pixels, and with this small resolution, the background takes too much space -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:27, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Aug 2026 at 14:11:46 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Estrildidae (Estrildid Finch)
Info created by Mojahid Mottakin – uploaded by Mojahid Mottakin – nominated by Sàádî -- Sàádî (talk) 14:11, 27 July 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Sàádî (talk) 14:14, 27 July 2026 (UTC)
Support And thanks for not apply denoise --Wilfredor (talk) 10:33, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 11:55, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 15:30, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 19:04, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 12:35, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:01, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:57, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:08, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Aug 2026 at 13:55:14 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery:Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Geology_and_chemistry#Microscopic_images_of_crystals
Info Created and uploaded by KarlGaff – nominated by IamMM -- IamMM (talk) 13:55, 27 July 2026 (UTC)
Support -- IamMM (talk) 13:55, 27 July 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you very much Ian for your kind words. I have a movie of this phase transition on my website at artofsciencephotography.com
- Just check the bottom of the liquid crystal page in the portfolios. KarlGaff (talk) 08:51, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Comment Sorry, but the documentation is minimal and apparently intended to be interpreted only by experts. Two obvious necessary pieces of information are the scale and how this effect was achieved. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:09, 27 July 2026 (UTC)
- True. Unfortunately, I didn't find any additional explanations in the Wiki Science Competition either. Personally, I have no issue with technical explanations. In any case, Karl's images — regardless of their visual appeal — address complex scientific matters. I hope he sees this conversation and at least includes a note about the zoom level and how to access them in the descriptions of this image and his other remarkable works. These images definitely stand a chance of come to FPC. @KarlGaff -- IamMM (talk) 19:54, 27 July 2026 (UTC)
- Magnified 100 times, a drop of liquid crystal was dispensed onto a glass plate and a cover slip placed on top. The liquid crystal spreads out into a uniform film under the weight of the cover slip. The image was captured using a microscope configured for crossed polarised light. The colours come about because liquid crystal is birefringent - it changes the polarisation state of the plane-polarised light passing through it. Now, the sort of labyrinthine pattern is caused by a phase transition. The liquid crystal sample is placed on a heat stage and at a particular temperature called the phase transition temperature, the liquid crystal changes from an opaque state to a transparent state, this is the transition front. The image width is about 2mm. KarlGaff (talk) 20:13, 28 July 2026 (UTC)
Sorry but per Alvesgaspar, we don't have enough information as to what this shows. The image is also barely above the 2 megapixel minimum. Cmao20 (talk) 13:09, 28 July 2026 (UTC)
Oppose- The problem is that I don't see how to add a detailed description to the image. The character count is very limited. When I entered my above description, it indicates that I am 500 characters above the limit! Can you advise how to add this detailed description please? KarlGaff (talk) 20:25, 28 July 2026 (UTC)
- Just edit the ‘summary’ section on the file page, rather than trying to enter it into the file information caption. No one really uses the file information section because, as you have found, it is pointlessly restrictive. Cmao20 (talk) 02:17, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you, I have updated that now. I find this whole website very confusing.. KarlGaff (talk) 10:25, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks for that. Removed my vote. Cmao20 (talk) 11:19, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
- Just edit the ‘summary’ section on the file page, rather than trying to enter it into the file information caption. No one really uses the file information section because, as you have found, it is pointlessly restrictive. Cmao20 (talk) 02:17, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
Alvesgaspar (talk) 20:00, 28 July 2026 (UTC)
Oppose For now.
Support now. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 12:57, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 19:04, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
Support For the wow factor. ★ 02:59, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Comment I believe this would be better placed in Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Geology_and_chemistry#Microscopic_images_of_crystals. That is, if liquid crystals fit under this subcategory...if there was a subcategory for phase transitions, I'd probably prefer that one.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Brainandforce (talk • contribs)
- Thanks Brainandforce. I changed the gallery link. -- IamMM (talk) 20:03, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Support A bit small nowadays, but so beautiful and also an attractive abstract artwork. – Aristeas (talk) 08:57, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:58, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support MZaplotnik(talk) 12:10, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:11, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Aug 2026 at 11:27:08 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Upupidae (Hoopoes)
Info created by IgorG88 – uploaded by IgorG88 – nominated by Smooth O -- Smooth O (talk) 11:27, 27 July 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Smooth O (talk) 11:27, 27 July 2026 (UTC)
Support Huge wow-factor, good quality Cmao20 (talk) 17:58, 27 July 2026 (UTC)
Comment Wow factor high and beautiful composition. There is something strange about some sections of the image as if the background has been cut out or the tree has been superimposed, this is particularly visible at the bottom in a section where it looks as if the tree has been eaten (note added) --Wilfredor (talk) 18:29, 27 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --Lmbuga (talk) 19:03, 27 July 2026 (UTC)
Comment I agree with Wilfredor, the background looks a bit strange. It would be nice to have Charlesjsharp's opinion, he has a sharp eye for detecting manipulated backgrounds. -- IamMM (talk) 20:04, 27 July 2026 (UTC)
- Igor Goblos is a very creative wildlife photographer. He appears to do a lot of post-processing work on foregrounds and backgrounds and likes the over-saturated look. And no EXIF is always a concern. But I can see no trickery in his images. This image would be an even better candidate for FP. Charlesjsharp (talk) 22:46, 27 July 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks for your review Charles. I agree that the image you mention is even more amazing but both are FP-worthy in my opinion so
Support -- IamMM (talk) 06:19, 28 July 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks for your review Charles. I agree that the image you mention is even more amazing but both are FP-worthy in my opinion so
- Igor Goblos is a very creative wildlife photographer. He appears to do a lot of post-processing work on foregrounds and backgrounds and likes the over-saturated look. And no EXIF is always a concern. But I can see no trickery in his images. This image would be an even better candidate for FP. Charlesjsharp (talk) 22:46, 27 July 2026 (UTC)
Support To me it looks good, I don't see anything suspicious, and there are other images from that photo session. Agree with Charles, that the other image with the open wings is even better Poco a poco (talk) 09:14, 28 July 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:31, 28 July 2026 (UTC)
Support Excellent! -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 20:01, 28 July 2026 (UTC)
Comment
Overprocessed Per Charles comment and I preffer the other one less processed --Wilfredor (talk) 02:52, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 11:56, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
Support Ermell (talk) 16:27, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 17:43, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
Support Wow factor is high, good composition and technical quality. Might look over-processed but OK for me --Benji 18:06, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 19:05, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Yes, the background. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:27, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Support per Poco a poco. – Aristeas (talk) 08:51, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support I think there was strong noise on the background and that denoising was applied on the background but that it was not applied with to the borders touching the tree, which creates this strange effect around the tree. So I don't think it's a fake background, just not perfect processing. But I think the picture has such wow effect that I can overlook these small processing flaws -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:17, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Aug 2026 at 06:37:06 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Spain
Info created by Lmbuga – uploaded by Lmbuga – nominated by Lmbuga -- Lmbuga (talk) 06:37, 27 July 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Lmbuga (talk) 06:37, 27 July 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 15:28, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
Support -- XRay 💬 18:24, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:02, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:47, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Neutral Here there is a bit more of dynamic, but again too straightforward. We have many others like this, but at least this is well executed Poco a poco (talk) 20:02, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support MZaplotnik(talk) 12:09, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 19:01, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Support IMHO the simplicity is the strength of this image. We usually put many things into fireworks photos, striving for a rather baroque abundance of beauty. The results are rather photos of ‘City x with fireworks’, ‘Castle y with fireworks’ etc.; in such photos the fireworks are just the icing. In contrast, this photo aims at showing the fireworks themselves, just like when we take a photo of only a single flower, and not of the whole garden, to show its beauty more clearly. – Aristeas (talk) 09:56, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Aug 2026 at 06:30:23 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Spain
Info created by Lmbuga – uploaded by Lmbuga – nominated by Lmbuga -- Lmbuga (talk) 06:30, 27 July 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Lmbuga (talk) 06:30, 27 July 2026 (UTC)
Support Beautiful abstract photo that stands out amongst the genre of fireworks pictures IMO. Cmao20 (talk) 11:39, 27 July 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 00:11, 28 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:01, 28 July 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:29, 28 July 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 15:28, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 17:42, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 19:05, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
Support -- XRay 💬 18:25, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 18:58, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Support -- IamMM (talk) 07:28, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:02, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Too simple IMHO. I'd support if there are some additional cool element in the compo like a cityscape, a bridge or something like this. Poco a poco (talk) 20:00, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 4 Aug 2026 at 19:37:53 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Tajikistan
Info Roof with ornaments in the pavilion, Khujand Fortress, Tajikistan. My shot. -- Mile (talk) 19:37, 26 July 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Mile (talk) 19:37, 26 July 2026 (UTC)
Support very sharp photo, amazing detail, unusal look -- George Chernilevsky talk 20:40, 26 July 2026 (UTC)
Support Per George. --Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 21:44, 26 July 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:18, 27 July 2026 (UTC)
Comment A very good photo, but to be truly outstanding, it should be square IMO. The top and bottom sections are missing--Lmbuga (talk) 06:43, 27 July 2026 (UTC)
- Do you think that would be good ? Above is highlited area (Sun), which would make shadow hard to recover. Also i was leaned down, 8 mm (16mm@FF). Maybe... Mile (talk) 10:46, 27 July 2026 (UTC)
- There are many ways to say absurd things to make yourself sound like you know what you’re talking about. No. NO. You don’t know any more than the rest of the world. You’re mistaken; you’re not exceptional, although the photo, as I said, is very good, but it could be much better.--Lmbuga (talk) 18:46, 27 July 2026 (UTC)
Support Excellent. Cmao20 (talk) 11:35, 27 July 2026 (UTC)
Support -- IamMM (talk) 17:23, 27 July 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Cropped at the top and bottom. Too much swagger--Lmbuga (talk) 18:51, 27 July 2026 (UTC)
Support It could use a slight shave of the right side to make it perfectly symmetrical, but even still, it's very appealing with the complementary colors. —brainandforce [yap] 19:18, 28 July 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Poor framing. Alvesgaspar (talk) 20:02, 28 July 2026 (UTC)
Weak oppose Excellent detail but poor crop. --Tagooty (talk) 04:12, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
Weak support Crop is not the best but still FP for me Юрий Д.К. 15:25, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
Weak oppose Good detail and compo but agree about the bottom crop Poco a poco (talk) 20:06, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Crop. Yann (talk) 20:57, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Weak oppose The cut is not symmetrical; the lower columns were cut at different times, and the lower cut was also more aggressive than the upper one. --Wilfredor (talk) 00:18, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 4 Aug 2026 at 14:34:35 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Italy
Info The Landtagsgebäude Bozen, seat of the Provincial Council of South Tyrol. Despite its unpretentious architecture, it is an important symbol for the long-lasting peaceful and democratic collaboration of South Tyrol's three ethnic and linguistic groups on the legislative level. All by me. --Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 14:34, 26 July 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 14:34, 26 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --JackyM59 (talk) 06:42, 27 July 2026 (UTC)
Support To me, a building with beautiful symmetry.--Famberhorst (talk) 04:54, 28 July 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:16, 28 July 2026 (UTC)
Support Simple but well-executed LetmeEditit (talk) 18:05, 28 July 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 15:23, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Certainly high quality, but boring building. The red boxes are distracting, and the left and right sides environment doesn't help. Also harsh light on mid-day. Sorry. Yann (talk) 15:45, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
Oppose per Yann --Milseburg (talk) 09:45, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Agree with Yann Poco a poco (talk) 20:08, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Oppose No wow, sorry. Good light but quite unexceptional architecture -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:29, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 4 Aug 2026 at 05:57:41 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Australia#South Australia
Info created and uploaded by XRay – nominated by SHB2000 //shb (t • c) 05:57, 26 July 2026 (UTC)
Support //shb (t • c) 05:57, 26 July 2026 (UTC)
Oppose QI for sure, as all XRay's pictures are, but I don't see it as FP, sorry. Composition feels arbitrary - you're crying out for the panorama of the lake to be completed on the right. Light is not that good, with much of the picture in shadow and the bright clouds in the top left being distracting. Cmao20 (talk) 11:33, 27 July 2026 (UTC)
Support For me it is a nice calm landscape, probably not so "wow", but beautiful Юрий Д.К. 15:18, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:02, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Oppose I concur with Cmao20 Poco a poco (talk) 20:09, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support MZaplotnik(talk) 05:28, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 4 Aug 2026 at 03:21:05 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family_:_Nyctaginaceae
Info First leaves on Bougainvillea propagated from a cutting. The big leaf is 2 cm (0.79 in) long, the thorn is 1 cm (0.39 in) long. Ooty, The Nilgiris, Tamil Nadu, India. Focus stack of 70 images. No FPs of genus bougainvillea. Created by Tagooty – uploaded by Tagooty – nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 03:21, 26 July 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Tagooty (talk) 03:21, 26 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --JackyM59 (talk) 06:42, 27 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 10:03, 27 July 2026 (UTC)
Support Good focus stack Cmao20 (talk) 11:31, 27 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:49, 28 July 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:17, 28 July 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry but the aesthetics doesn't work for me. Alvesgaspar (talk) 20:04, 28 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 11:57, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
Support Like the colors and details Юрий Д.К. 15:16, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 19:32, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --Steven Sun (talk) 06:56, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:02, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 4 Aug 2026 at 02:07:41 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air transport#Airliners
Info A Southwest Airlines 737 climbing after takeoff from Baltimore Washington International Thurgood Marshall Airport, Maryland, in front of a cumulus congestus cloud. Created, uploaded and nominated by Acroterion -- Acroterion (talk) 02:07, 26 July 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Acroterion (talk) 02:07, 26 July 2026 (UTC)
Support A very beautiful photo that not only captures the airplane well but also features a good composition. -- XRay 💬 08:42, 26 July 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 09:40, 26 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 10:56, 26 July 2026 (UTC)
Support Per XRay. Also, good categorization. --Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 13:50, 26 July 2026 (UTC)
Oppose I miss something here to call it extraordinary, sorry Poco a poco (talk) 14:48, 26 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 16:43, 26 July 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Very good image quality, nice composition. But no more. Alvesgaspar (talk) 19:13, 26 July 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Sharpening artefatcs (see insciptions), CA should be removed, and much dislike composition. Would say maybe QI if mistakes corrected. --Mile (talk) 19:41, 26 July 2026 (UTC)
- I see a few speckles toward the front of the plane that would be NR remnants - the underneath of a dark plane against a bright sky is challenging - and a little CA near the nose that I'll try to address. As for the composition, it's a matter of taste, but far too many pictures of airplanes are just static depictions, rather than showing a fast-moving flying machine climbing into an interesting sky, with plenty of leading space. Acroterion (talk) 22:11, 26 July 2026 (UTC)
Support Striking colours and good use of lead room make it FP to me. Cmao20 (talk) 11:31, 27 July 2026 (UTC)
Support At first glance I liked this image, but its full impact only revealed itself when viewed full-screen on a large, calibrated monitor. The composition is outstanding as well: the generous lead room, the dramatic cloud backdrop, and the sense of motion make this much more than just another aircraft photograph. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:32, 27 July 2026 (UTC)
Support I feel like this tops the marketing images airlines use. —brainandforce [yap] 08:08, 28 July 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:27, 28 July 2026 (UTC)
Support Zquid (talk) 22:05, 28 July 2026 (UTC)
Support Agree with Radomianin and Brainandforce. Thanks to the clouds and the colour contrast this photo is more attractive and impressive than many of our existing aircraft FPs. – Aristeas (talk) 09:24, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 19:05, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 Aug 2026 at 20:48:52 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Black and White#Landscapes
Info Tarasp municipality Scuol gemeente Scuol in Lower Engadin, Graubünden. Alps above the lake. Created by Agnes Monkelbaan – uploaded by Agnes Monkelbaan – nominated by Zquid -- Zquid (talk) 20:48, 25 July 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Zquid (talk) 20:48, 25 July 2026 (UTC)
Support -- XRay 💬 08:45, 26 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 09:21, 26 July 2026 (UTC)
Support -- IamMM (talk) 14:42, 26 July 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry, but I can't see anything extraordinary. Alvesgaspar (talk) 19:15, 26 July 2026 (UTC)
Support Atmospheric nature photo, in b/w--Paracel63 (talk) 23:04, 26 July 2026 (UTC)
Neutral Nice atmospheric image with an effective use of fog and black-and-white, creating a peaceful mood. The composition is clean, though the subject remains rather simple, sorry not FP IMO--Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 07:26, 27 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 10:02, 27 July 2026 (UTC)
Support Artistically effective, the lone cross standing on a hill shrouded by mist.Good use of black and white, and the wide letterbox crop highlights how solitary the cross is Cmao20 (talk) 11:30, 27 July 2026 (UTC)
Support Impressive to me. The fog and monochrome create a strong atmosphere. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:28, 28 July 2026 (UTC)
Support Thank you for promoting my photo.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:10, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
Support per Cmao20 and Radomianin. – Aristeas (talk) 09:21, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:02, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Per Alvesgaspar, also too static (centered) Poco a poco (talk) 20:10, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Neutral I like very much the idea and I found this image beautiful but Per Alvesgaspar, Centered composition, main subject too far away --Wilfredor (talk) 19:22, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:15, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Timetable (day 5 after nomination)
Wed 29 Jul → Mon 03 Aug Thu 30 Jul → Tue 04 Aug Fri 31 Jul → Wed 05 Aug Sat 01 Aug → Thu 06 Aug Sun 02 Aug → Fri 07 Aug Mon 03 Aug → Sat 08 Aug
Timetable (day 9 after nomination, last day of voting)
Sat 25 Jul → Mon 03 Aug Sun 26 Jul → Tue 04 Aug Mon 27 Jul → Wed 05 Aug Tue 28 Jul → Thu 06 Aug Wed 29 Jul → Fri 07 Aug Thu 30 Jul → Sat 08 Aug Fri 31 Jul → Sun 09 Aug Sat 01 Aug → Mon 10 Aug Sun 02 Aug → Tue 11 Aug Mon 03 Aug → Wed 12 Aug
Closing nominations manually
The following description explains how to close nominations manually. Normally this is not necessary, as FPCBot takes care of counting the votes, closing and archiving the nominations. When the Bot has counted the votes, a user needs to check and approve the result; everything else is done by the Bot. Therefore, the following instructions are normally only needed for delist-and-replace nominations that the Bot cannot (yet) process, and in case the Bot malfunctions. The closing can be done by any experienced user. If you need help, just ask on the FPC talk page.
Closing a featured picture nomination
- On Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the nomination, then [edit].
- Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line):
{{FPC-results-reviewed|support=x|oppose=x|neutral=x|featured=(“yes” or “no”)|gallery=xxx|sig=~~~~}}
(You can leave thegalleryparameter blank if the image was not featured. If the nomination contains alternatives, you must add thealternative=xxxparameter with the name of the selected image between thegalleryand thesigparameter. See {{FPC-results-reviewed}} for examples and more explanations.) - Edit the title of the nomination and add
featuredornot featuredafter the link – for example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], featured === - Save your edit.
- Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line):
- If it is featured:
- Add the picture to the list of the four most recently featured pictures of an appropriate gallery of Commons:Featured pictures, list as the first one and delete the last one, so that the number is four again.
- Add the picture to the appropriate featured picture gallery page and section. Click on the most appropriate link beneath where you just added it as one of the four images on Commons:Featured pictures, list to find the gallery page, and search for the correct section. (An image should only appear ONE time in the galleries. After a successful nomination, the image can be placed in several of the Featured pictures categories.)
- Add the template
{{Assessments|featured=1}}to the image description page.- If it was an alternative image or part of a set nomination, use the
com-nomparameter. For example, if File:Foo.jpg was promoted in the nominationCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bar.jpg, use{{Assessments|featured=1|com-nom=Bar.jpg}}You also need thecom-nomparameter if the image gets renamed. - If the image is already featured on another Wikipedia, just add
featured=1to the {{Assessments}} template. For instance,{{Assessments|enwiki=1}}becomes{{Assessments|enwiki=1|featured=1}}
- If it was an alternative image or part of a set nomination, use the
- Head over to the structured data for the image and add the “Commons quality assessment” claim (P6731) “Wikimedia Commons featured picture” (Q63348049).
- Add the picture to the chronological archives of featured pictures. Place it at the end of the gallery using this format:
File:xxxxx.jpg|# '''Title'''<br>created by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], uploaded by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]<br> {{s|xxx}}, {{o|xxx}}, {{n|xxx}}- The
#should be replaced by 1 for the first image nominated that month, and counts up after that. Have a look at the other entries on that page for examples. (If you want to do everything perfectly, link that number to the nomination subpage, just like FPCBot does this. It allows users to jump directly to the nomination.) - The
Titleshould be replaced by the bare name of the featured picture, without the ‘File:’ or the file extension (such as .jpg .tif .svg). - The
xin{{s|x}}, {{o|x}}, {{n|x}}should be replaced by the count of support, oppose, and neutral votes respectively. - If the nomination was a set nomination, use this format:
File:xxxxx.jpg|# '''Set: Title (Z files)'''<br>created by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], uploaded by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]<br> {{s|x}}, {{o|x}}, {{n|x}}
Replace theZin(Z files)by the count of images in the set, and use the name of the first image from the set instead ofFile:xxxxx.jpgand for the title.
- The
- Add
== FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotion|File:XXXXX.jpg}}to the talk page of the nominator. For set nominations, use:== Set Promoted to FP ==, using the names of the set files instead of the XXXXXX and the title of the set instead of YYYYY.
<gallery>
File:XXXXXX.jpg
File:XXXXXX.jpg
</gallery>
{{FPpromotionSet2|YYYYY}} - Add
== FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotedUploader|File:XXXXX.jpg}}to the talk page of the user who has uploaded the image, if that user is not the same as the nominator. - Add
== FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotedCreator|File:XXXXX.jpg}}to the talk page of the creator, if the author is a different Commons user than nominator and uploader.
- Add candidate archive categories to the nomination so that people can easily find and evaluate past nominations (this applies also to unsuccessful, {{FPX}}-d, {{FPD}}-d and {{Withdraw}}-n nominations). It’s best practice to wrap all these categories in a
<noinclude>...</noinclude>section because they apply only to the nomination itself, not to the log page etc. which transclude it. You need three or four categories:- A category for the month and year, like Category:August 2026 featured picture candidates for the current month.
- A category for the type and result of the nomination, like Category:2026 successful candidates for featured picture status; replace “successful” by “unsuccessful”, “FPXed”, “FPDed” or “withdrawn”, depending on the final result of the nomination (see the supercategory for common values).
- A category for the subject of the nomination, like Category:2026 featured picture candidates of plants. Replace “plants” by one of the possible subject keywords like “animals”, “architecture”, etc.; see the base category for all common keywords. Basically the subject keywords correspond to the first part of the gallery link.
- If the nomination is a set nomination, add Category:2026 featured picture set nominations.
- As the last step (whether the image is featured or not; including {{FPX}}-d, {{FPD}}-d and {{Withdraw}}-n nominations), you have to move the transclusion (the {{ }} and the text within those) of the nomination to the current log page.
- To find the current log page, visit the first page of the log for this month. If the header of that page contains a link with the text “Next part of this month”, the log for this month has been split into several parts because it contains too many entries. Click on the “Next part …” link and repeat this until you reach a page where the header does not offer a “Next part …” link; that’s the last and current log page.
- Now open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination you are closing. It will be of the form:
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}or:{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/XXXXX}}. - Copy that line to the bottom of the current log page and save that page. Then remove the same line from the candidate list and save that page.
Closing a delisting nomination
- On Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line):{{FPC-delist-results-reviewed|delist=x|keep=x|neutral=x|delisted=yes/no|sig=~~~~}}
(for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/File:Ensifera ensifera (22271195865).jpg) - Edit the title of the delisting nomination and add
delistedornot delistedafter the image title; for example:=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], delisted === - Add candidate archive categories to the nomination; this works the same way as described above for featured picture nominations. The only difference is that the category for type and status must be of the form Category:2026 successful candidates for delisting from featured picture status, or Category:2026 successful candidates for delisting and replacing featured pictures if this is a delist-and-replace nomination. Substitute “unsuccessful”, “FPXed”, “FPDed” or “withdrawn” for “successful”, depending on the final result of the nomination.
- Move the transclusion of the nomination to the current log page; please see above for an explanation how to find the current log page and how to move the nomination to it.
- If the outcome was not delisted, stop here. If it is delisted:
- Remove the picture from Commons:Featured pictures, list and any subpages.
- Edit the picture's description as follows:
- In the {{Assessments}} template on the image description page, change
featured=1tofeatured=2(do not remove the {{Assessments}} template; do not change anything related to its status in other featured picture processes). If the image description page uses the old {{Featured picture}} template, replace it with{{Assessments|featured=2}}. - Remove the image from all categories beginning with "Featured [pictures]" (example: Featured night photography, Featured pictures from Wiki Loves Monuments 2016, Featured pictures of Paris); but not from categories about featured pictures on specific Wikipedia editions, like Category:Featured pictures on Wikipedia, English.
- Remove the "Commons quality assessment" claim (P6731) "Wikimedia Commons featured picture" (Q63348049) from the picture's Structured data.
- In the {{Assessments}} template on the image description page, change
- Add a delisting-comment to the original entry in the chronological archive of featured pictures in bold-face, e. g. delisted 2007-07-19 (1–6) with (1–6) meaning 1 keep and 6 delist votes (change as appropriate). The picture must not be removed from the chronological archives.
- If this is a Delist and Replace, the delisting and promotion must both be done manually. To do the promotion, follow the steps in the section above. Note that the assessment tag on the file page and the promotion tag on the nominator's talk page won't pick up the /replace subpage that these nominations use.
Archiving a withdrawn nomination
If a nomination has been withdrawn by the nominator by using {{Withdraw}} or is cancelled with {{FPX}} or {{FPD}}, wait 24 hours after the nomination was last edited. If there has been no objection to the cancellation within this time, the nomination can simply be archived. Just add candidate archive categories to the nomination itself, then move the transclusion of the nomination to the current log page; please see above for an explanation how to find the current log page and how to move the nomination to it.
